Part II - Enacted First Nations Legislation

Decision Information

Decision Content

( zQwmm Btsam mm ccmzm mmmtm xmxum mm zmxm f no. &0 1972 m xm m i $b h m m« 2# 1972 v&srsas it- ia ûmmâ, sdviaiCalo ard axpcâlaat ta mmà Xssâisa Sauâ seairg lo* 6# £972** «w ® 1 W mm xnâim mm c&mxdl la mmeMmâ* enacts m fallow » 1 i . » qtiaaiiïh Indian Band zoaiag Ma. 6 . 1972* la mmiï&âl by rsm»^Nris saæfcioa $ Wmçm& m A ction S . 2. «ScjowaWk India** Bead Boning 130. 6# 1972** 4s horeSay «sssaâad fcy tk s add iti on thoroto of soctdosi $ *#s4$* mm,X $ « 4* svery applicant fa r ait a*9SS&& to th ia gywxss* or a pexs&t fo r t£ws day®ar§s*ii!tfe# soustraction, g conetrUfOtioa> altoaratioa or estfcenaion of a bu ild lr^ or structura and fo r tho qporatlon of m trada or co llio g ood every para©** iafcàndiàig to «ræàssnoa, bstiXd# éoastsm st, reconstruct, a lta r or m&. a bnix&isg or structure or ta operate a business, traâa or-JpSîiyRIiAfcS*' %X13r *Mw» ¥$*&*■ ioJ:or:s<*âtiosi; A or of 1£h© sra*l to tse affec tas. fhs location of , s tre e ts , lunes, M$mggm0 driveways, parking areas, *1 asd ether of the sits? <t>) Exsdlialiŝ aty artMtacfcoral plans fo r ony sSee œ â tho lr re latio n s to tha elevations «sa ^oinlog ptacteXmt (d) S8is location, &Xm* X;edght, colcnîr, Xî sfctog sud ©r&a*tsfe4©» of a ll signa* Ce) "fha location aaâ treati^ nt o f \wtâ90m&& && faeces?
^
^
(ê) . & q£ iisbecsdôâ. ISSBSâ Cf) a « «ifâe»fe -«£ the interest of the «spi?liow^:ismiQi 0») £h «Mri&Mtall cctansrscecMant date proposed schedule ( i) a trfce&mHfc of fim n c ie l respcmeibiXity, including the posting of fcoaâ» or cash to assure Wm insfcM letion of a£f~aite os a coalitio n of togethtar with such other ihSaroetioi* m « t a ll i s the opinio** of the Scptisdlh Indian Band Council he nocossary to m&b Council to have due regard to the connidoruticns enuraoratoa i s lection $ of the ajusssslSh Xndiss Baaâ smiisf t^*4.m Ho* 6, 1972# 3* £ icuerdnh Indien Band foeiisg No, 6# %$Tf% is hsrely dasoâeâ by the additien thereto of seeblo» 7 vhich nhall reeds 7* (a) ^vary porio** ybo violates or m m m or allai to bo violated ary of tbs ïuxsvisiot» of th is By-law Shall fee g u ilty of an offones against th is %whuwt and wdh day « » tfoltib sodh 'Violation occurs or 1» caused or elle»fe& to continue» Shall const! h its a (fe) svery psraou guilty of ns 4M»iMrP> be lia b le on S3Û& than $10.00 not $100*00 or te» bot. essseeâing 30 or to both and !npriaonr.i^t. le a cs^arstics# every perses* *4bo at the than of the «cow jaiaaios* of the offence w m a director or o fficer of the corporation is g u ilty of the lib s offence, unless be proves that the act or osaisaiai* ooastitntliig thé offence toch place without Ma Icoowledge or M sn i. or that be ^eredsed a ll due diligence to prom it the oxfeission of such o ff coco* 4# This jy-luw »say be c ited for M l i#*rpos«s8 as tMi sguatcdsb Indian Band Zoning By-law Ho# 6, 1972, injers&aent By-law Ho* 7# 1972* Cooaidoared ty the Igueraisn Indian Band
^
V V ' Coojacil oo the» &%h day Atig«srfc a*d# 1972* CM* a. SS à i S s it . c s c J jW Ccaincillor 1*1 sagas Ŝ̂ SsŜ lat .,S fa ;,f*g&n- ---- Lll m&m?h W W 1 <59S$WâiiXl3$" ISC Ccm2¥syj,or CounciXXcgc* CXas&sljJLaar g . B illy Ccrô ctilXQr cmm£&XXms
^^ ^
^
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.